The Evolution of Everything: How Small Changes Transform Our World

The Evolution of Everything: How Small Changes Transform Our World

  • Downloads:2735
  • Type:Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date:2021-05-25 10:54:25
  • Update Date:2025-09-06
  • Status:finish
  • Author:Matt Ridley
  • ISBN:000754247X
  • Environment:PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle

Summary

The New York Times bestselling author of The Rational Optimist and Genome returns with a fascinating, brilliant argument for evolution that definitively dispels a dangerous, widespread myth: that we can command and control our world。

The Evolution of Everything is about bottom-up order and its enemy, the top-down twitch—the endless fascination human beings have for design rather than evolution, for direction rather than emergence。 Drawing on anecdotes from science, economics, history, politics and philosophy, Matt Ridley’s wide-ranging, highly opinionated opus demolishes conventional assumptions that major scientific and social imperatives are dictated by those on high, whether in government, business, academia, or morality。 On the contrary, our most important achievements develop from the bottom up。 Patterns emerge, trends evolve。 Just as skeins of geese form Vs in the sky without meaning to, and termites build mud cathedrals without architects, so brains take shape without brain-makers, learning can happen without teaching and morality changes without a plan。

Although we neglect, defy and ignore them, bottom-up trends shape the world。 The growth of technology, the sanitation-driven health revolution, the quadrupling of farm yields so that more land can be released for nature—these were largely emergent phenomena, as were the Internet, the mobile phone revolution, and the rise of Asia。 Ridley demolishes the arguments for design and effectively makes the case for evolution in the universe, morality, genes, the economy, culture, technology, the mind, personality, population, education, history, government, God, money, and the future。

As compelling as it is controversial, authoritative as it is ambitious, Ridley’s stunning perspective will revolutionize the way we think about our world and how it works。

Download

Reviews

Choonghwan

The theory of evolution revolutionized not only biology but also every human endeavour from psychology, history, politics to economy。 We, human beings, have a tendency to make simplistic stories to understand and rationalize what happened with the benefit of hindsight。 It is a very humbling moment to admit that we are blindly playing certain roles largely conditioned by historic constraints and accidents。 Lao Tzu once said, "Govern a Great Country as You Would Cook a Small Fish。" The theory of evolution revolutionized not only biology but also every human endeavour from psychology, history, politics to economy。 We, human beings, have a tendency to make simplistic stories to understand and rationalize what happened with the benefit of hindsight。 It is a very humbling moment to admit that we are blindly playing certain roles largely conditioned by historic constraints and accidents。 Lao Tzu once said, "Govern a Great Country as You Would Cook a Small Fish。" 。。。more

Vignesh Yelluri

3。95*I really loved the whole idea behind this book which is so true。 But at the same time, I wasn't a fan of the author's narrating style。 Very interesting concepts but with too much factual explanations。Loved the evolution of esp。 Morality, Religion, Tech, Internet and ofcourse Economics !!Google talks video about this book gives a very good overview ! 3。95*I really loved the whole idea behind this book which is so true。 But at the same time, I wasn't a fan of the author's narrating style。 Very interesting concepts but with too much factual explanations。Loved the evolution of esp。 Morality, Religion, Tech, Internet and ofcourse Economics !!Google talks video about this book gives a very good overview ! 。。。more

John Biddle

This is an outstanding book。 It's central thesis is fairly summed up by the idea that Darwin's Theory of Evolution should really be called the Special Theory of Evolution, since it is only one of a large number of important systems that evolve as opposed to being designed。As he says, change in technology, language, morality, and society is incremental, inexorable, gradual, and spontaneous。 It is best thought of as bottom up change, trial and error change。 Ridley provides myriad examples of how t This is an outstanding book。 It's central thesis is fairly summed up by the idea that Darwin's Theory of Evolution should really be called the Special Theory of Evolution, since it is only one of a large number of important systems that evolve as opposed to being designed。As he says, change in technology, language, morality, and society is incremental, inexorable, gradual, and spontaneous。 It is best thought of as bottom up change, trial and error change。 Ridley provides myriad examples of how this works and has worked。 He provides details so you can check him if you like。 I was pleased at the number of thinkers and books that I admired who are in here, and was also pleased at the number of references to people and books that I want to become familiar with。 There is so much here I'm sure I will be reading this again within a year。I also greatly admired his "Rational Optimist" but this book is even better。 The thrust of Optimist is that things are much better than we think they are, but that wasn't really new, just a minority opinion。 He laid it all out very well, but didn't break much new ground。 This book is different。 This idea that the rest of the parts of civilization are evolving like life evolves is, at least to me, a wholly new idea and a brilliant one at that。 Bravo Matt Ridley; Highly recommended。 。。。more

Aman Negi

Good mind-opening book on a host of multidisciplinary topics right from the internet to morality。 A good read for anyone who wants to understand what led us to where we are today from the angle of evolution, technology, sociology and biology。

Tom Beale

There's an irony to Matt Ridley's book which is that he spends more time arguing AGAINST alternative ideas to evolution as he does arguing for them。 It's an argument that at least is very clear, but often is very forced in it's delivery。 The idea is that many things in life and society have evolved naturally, such as particles, genes, government, the economy etc。 What was most gob-smacking was he barely includes power in his argument。 The word 'power' isn't even used until late in the book, and There's an irony to Matt Ridley's book which is that he spends more time arguing AGAINST alternative ideas to evolution as he does arguing for them。 It's an argument that at least is very clear, but often is very forced in it's delivery。 The idea is that many things in life and society have evolved naturally, such as particles, genes, government, the economy etc。 What was most gob-smacking was he barely includes power in his argument。 The word 'power' isn't even used until late in the book, and then only a handful of times。 I would like to have seen him grapple with a chapter arguing that power evolves, unplanned and without anyone's design。 To me this is a critical force that undermines his argument。Also he keeps getting in the way of his own polemics。 For instance, Ridley can't help but settling old scores (such as a diversion into his crop circle myth busting in the chapter on religion), and he frequently sets up an imaginary, caricatured critic only to shut them down。 For instance he goes at length to talk about creationism as an obviously wrong and stupid theory of the origins of life, but holds up the weakest arguments he can find in order to make his own look stronger。 That just makes his own view weaker。And I can't quite let go some of his morally snooty views - there is a reference early on to 'clubs', which he calls 'mating arenas'。 It's almost like he's given up trying to talk to a reader interested in the science of evolution, and instead has to introduce his own politics。 I'm not a big fan of clubs, in fact I rather dislike them - but calling them mating arenas is just insulting, petty and infantile。 。。。more

Yehudis Dick

I liked the theme of his book: that most things emerge from small incremental steps from the bottom up (ie。 evolution) rather than being created centrally by intention。 Ridley argues that Darwin's theory of evolution should be called the "special" theory of evolution because there is a "general" theory of evolution that applies to things like language, culture, technological advance or economics。 The rules of a language aren't created by grammarians; they emerge by consensus。 New inventions and I liked the theme of his book: that most things emerge from small incremental steps from the bottom up (ie。 evolution) rather than being created centrally by intention。 Ridley argues that Darwin's theory of evolution should be called the "special" theory of evolution because there is a "general" theory of evolution that applies to things like language, culture, technological advance or economics。 The rules of a language aren't created by grammarians; they emerge by consensus。 New inventions and discoveries aren't created by a single "great man"; discoveries are often discovered by different people simultaneously because they build on the same body of previous discoveries。 Economies don't need a central agency telling people what and how to produce goods; products are produced without a single person knowing how to produce the object from scratch。 These systems are man-made, but not made by man。I am in university for both computer science and biology, and this book helped me express why I'm attracted to both of these seemingly dissimilar subjects。 The order than emerges from the chaos of thousands of individual programmers contributing to a massive open source project, a mass of code of which not a single person has read in its entirety - doesn't that sound like evolution of a living creature? 。。。more

Asif

The author explains the evolutionary story of the various topics, some of the topics are thought-provoking。The various aspects of the top-down approach。And how good things evolve gradually, unplanned and totally accidental

AilsaOD

As popular science goes this is a pretty niche book。 I've read a few books about evolution but that's not enough for this book: you also need a good understanding of economics, finance, politics and other aspects of society。 I don't know a lot on these topics so there were whole sections that I got nothing out of because I had no idea what Ridley was talking about and sometimes even what his point was。 You also need to be able to keep an insane number of different people and what they did/said s As popular science goes this is a pretty niche book。 I've read a few books about evolution but that's not enough for this book: you also need a good understanding of economics, finance, politics and other aspects of society。 I don't know a lot on these topics so there were whole sections that I got nothing out of because I had no idea what Ridley was talking about and sometimes even what his point was。 You also need to be able to keep an insane number of different people and what they did/said straight (especially in chapter one)。 Another thing to bear in mind is that while being mostly about evolution - or 'bottom-up systems' - it is also a love letter to libertarianism and sometimes Ridley gets distracted by his love for free markets。 I personally am wary of libertarianism so this coloured my experience somewhat and the economics chapter almost made me dnf because it made me so angry! I do think that Ridley has some great ideas that I haven't previously encountered but explain the world and society better than more common explanations/excuses。 HOWEVER, after that economy chapter I found I could no longer trust Ridley。 There is one instance of misinformation (or possibly poor explanation if I'm feeling charitable) that I noticed: the medical spending of the average American household is said to have massively increased and Ridley attributes this to hospitals being state-run。 The only problem with this is that most hospitals in the USA are not state run and this increased cost is to my understanding from medical insurance or increasingly expensive treatments and everything to do with the free market。 The other problem I have is that many of Ridley's examples of how privatisation and deregulation are the solution to every societal problem is that they feature systems containing many small businesses and don't account for massive corporations and monopolies。 Everything sounds nice and pretty in theory but a lot of systems sound good before someone tries to actually use them。 In the 5 or so years since this book was published some parts have aged extremely poorly and I would like to know if any of Ridley's opinions have changed - for example there is a section where he says people are too dogmatic about climate change and that there is very little proof that the changes caused would be particularly bad (he does follow this with something with the vibe of 'haha just kidding。。。 unless?' and I wonder what he thought about the Amazon being on fire for much of last year。 Or I guess even his stance on the pandemic's impact of businesses。 Should government shore up businesses in times of crisis or should the pandemic act like a biblical flood? This book was hard to rate because at different points in reading it I thought I would be rating it five and one star so I have averaged these out and given it three。 I think this would be a terrible introductory book if you are unfamiliar with any of the topics in this book (like me) - go read something else and form some opinions of your own first! 。。。more

Peter Gelfan

This book isn’t about just evolution。 It presents a very different way of looking at just about everything, from global politics, economics, and religion to our own minds and morality。 We are not here living in a world bound by laws and preordained by history but are riding the roiling crest of a wave pushing into an undetermined, unpredictable future。 Okay, that’s a bit dramatic, but it describes the sort of excitement and fear this outlook inspires if you perform a thought experiment and flip This book isn’t about just evolution。 It presents a very different way of looking at just about everything, from global politics, economics, and religion to our own minds and morality。 We are not here living in a world bound by laws and preordained by history but are riding the roiling crest of a wave pushing into an undetermined, unpredictable future。 Okay, that’s a bit dramatic, but it describes the sort of excitement and fear this outlook inspires if you perform a thought experiment and flip your brain into seeing things that way for a few moments。Ridley’s arguments are clear and seem well backed up by lots of facts。 He’s not promoting some new or old dogma。 At one point early on, I did get a little suspicious that the book might be a disguised libertarian manifesto, but that didn’t pan out; his criticism of historical and current politics covers the globe and leaves no ism unscathed。 You may not agree with everything he says, but that’s not the point。 Just thinking about these ideas will make you smarter。 。。。more

madi tedrow

An important book for recognizing the unavoidable cause-and-effect relationships between environments and systems, but Ridley's analysis felt too obvious at some points and glazed over at others。 He tackles topics ranging from economics to culture to the existence of a supreme being - an attempt that while admirable for its breath, just couldn't hit the detail some of the topics required。 Maybe this was on purpose, to emphasize the overhead theme of evolution and leave the rest to speculation, b An important book for recognizing the unavoidable cause-and-effect relationships between environments and systems, but Ridley's analysis felt too obvious at some points and glazed over at others。 He tackles topics ranging from economics to culture to the existence of a supreme being - an attempt that while admirable for its breath, just couldn't hit the detail some of the topics required。 Maybe this was on purpose, to emphasize the overhead theme of evolution and leave the rest to speculation, but as a reader I felt like the chapters ended more often than not with an incomplete explanation。 。。。more

Adithya Yerramsetty

Too superficial, not particularly intriguing and thought provoking。

Patrick

I've thoroughly enjoyed reading everything by Ridley, and this was no exception。 Paradigm shifting book - everything is an emergent phenomena。 He argues that everyone, and everything, is emergent when the world is ripe enough for the evolution to happen。 For example, if the light bulb wasn't invented by Edison (or others), it would have been invented by someone else because the technology and the state of the world were ready for it to exist。 If Einstein hadn't came up with relatively, others wo I've thoroughly enjoyed reading everything by Ridley, and this was no exception。 Paradigm shifting book - everything is an emergent phenomena。 He argues that everyone, and everything, is emergent when the world is ripe enough for the evolution to happen。 For example, if the light bulb wasn't invented by Edison (or others), it would have been invented by someone else because the technology and the state of the world were ready for it to exist。 If Einstein hadn't came up with relatively, others would have。 If Gates didn't create the personal computer, someone else would have。 It is a fascinating way to look at the evolution of life, technology, and how things come into existence。 The future will work the same way - it will evolve and emerge as things constantly adapt and change。Highly recommended read。 。。。more

Iliyana Braykova

Two months after reading this libertarian propaganda book I'm still mad about it。 And no, it's not because of politics, nor religion, it's because I hate it when people of the elite try to cherry pick anecdotes and strategically selected facts and stats to back ideas that first and foremost benefit themselves。 If there is a similar book whose arguments are better crafted, please point it out to me, I won't hesitate to read it and maybe make up my mind。 But what Matt Ridley has written is a scien Two months after reading this libertarian propaganda book I'm still mad about it。 And no, it's not because of politics, nor religion, it's because I hate it when people of the elite try to cherry pick anecdotes and strategically selected facts and stats to back ideas that first and foremost benefit themselves。 If there is a similar book whose arguments are better crafted, please point it out to me, I won't hesitate to read it and maybe make up my mind。 But what Matt Ridley has written is a science-washed propaganda book。 The redactor could have at least pointed out that many of the author's arguments contradict each other and fix them pre-publishing (for a short example see the chapter on education)。I was very impressed with the book for the first three chapters, and I must say that the confrontation with this unknown to me perspective gave me something。 There were some things I agreed with in every chapter because I like what the title and the synopsis suggest - that all things in society evolve just the same way as our biology does。 But to conclude that everything that happens without government interference is good (or at least most of it) and everything that governments do is bad - regardless of the fact that governments and government systems evolve too - is, frankly, either stupid or dishonest。 。。。more

Dario Mungoi

Another great book by Matt Ridley。As the title says the book goes through the evolutionary process of a lot of different areas of our lives we commonly think are the way they are because they were created or directed by a man or an entity。It is a good introduction different foundational areas of our life that will spark your interest into learning more about them from some of the resources available throughout the book。

Susan Hyttinen

I found the premise of the book compelling but lack of complexity, (selective) evidence and climate change denialism etc。 were somewhat insurmountable points of criticism for me。

Robert Banovský

A bit misleading title。 Deals more with issues of liberal vs。 state controlled than evolution。

Huong

Montessori schools rock。

Abhishek

This book was suggested to me by a friend who knows about my obsession with the "why" of the world。 I have to say, I am not 100% convinced about author's findings, but nonetheless this book makes some great arguments about how everything that comes to be, is almost always bottom up instead of top down。When the author says "everything", he means, everything from universe, morality, life, genes, culture to leadership, government, religion, money and even the internet。 In total there are 16 topics/ This book was suggested to me by a friend who knows about my obsession with the "why" of the world。 I have to say, I am not 100% convinced about author's findings, but nonetheless this book makes some great arguments about how everything that comes to be, is almost always bottom up instead of top down。When the author says "everything", he means, everything from universe, morality, life, genes, culture to leadership, government, religion, money and even the internet。 In total there are 16 topics/chapters that is tackled in the book overall。 Each chapter goes in detail explaining the evolution of that particular topic。 About one third of the way in, the book starts to almost repeat itself in terms of the argument used to explain the evolution of that particular topic。 Yes, it's bottom up; yes, a single person couldn't have influenced the progress in a particular field。 Yes, If not Einstein, somebody else would've made the discovery。 And so on。For me it was a little bit disappointing that the author never gets deeper than just showing the evolution working in that particular field。 What I would've loved to have seen is an explicit framework of the evolution which is agnostic to any of the phenomenon with clearly defined stages。 And then use that framework to tackle these topics。 Although to be fair, one can glean the structure with the repetitive explaination。 Even then, it's a great cover story for a magazine or a lavish Sunday article in a newspaper at best。 For me atleast, a book is a little bit stretched。 The highlights on the other hand in the book is some genuinely well written stories in each of the topics。 It's difficult to see any other book tackling the issue of evolution in everyday life。 Maybe like any subject, if more people write about this, we will all benefit from the variety of thoughts on it。 Till then author's the only game in town。All in all, I would still recommend the book, because it does challenge the traditional notion of the great man theory of history in a very logical and structured manner。 It's well written in a very accessible way。 。。。more

L

Buku ini adalah buku kedua karya Matt Ridley yang saya baca setelah The Red Queen。 Satu hal yang selalu saya ingat dari penulis adalah bagaimana ia menyampaikan isi buku dengan begitu bersahabat。 Meskipun, tentu saja, hampir tidak ada karya nonfiksi tanpa istilah alien。 Namun, sekali lagi, dibandingkan dengan karya nonfiksi sejenis dari penulis lain, karya Matt Ridley-lah yang sejauh ini paling 'ramah'。Buku ini mengandung 16 bab dan memiliki inti yang sama: pemaparan argumen-argumen evolusi di b Buku ini adalah buku kedua karya Matt Ridley yang saya baca setelah The Red Queen。 Satu hal yang selalu saya ingat dari penulis adalah bagaimana ia menyampaikan isi buku dengan begitu bersahabat。 Meskipun, tentu saja, hampir tidak ada karya nonfiksi tanpa istilah alien。 Namun, sekali lagi, dibandingkan dengan karya nonfiksi sejenis dari penulis lain, karya Matt Ridley-lah yang sejauh ini paling 'ramah'。Buku ini mengandung 16 bab dan memiliki inti yang sama: pemaparan argumen-argumen evolusi di balik ranah kehidupan。 Maka dari itu, jika hanya penasaran dengan topik tertentu (misal hukum, moral, pendidikan, uang, agama, ataupun lainnya) bisa langsung menuntaskan khusus bab tersebut。Sebelum membaca buku ini, saya memang hanya menganggap bahwa evolusi hanya terjadi pada makhluk hidup—bagaimana proses perkembangan organisme yang lamban melewati serangkaian seleksi alam dan mutasi yang acak。 Lewat buku ini, penulis berhasil meyakinkan saya bahwa setiap proses yang berjalan di dunia ini telah melalui fase lamban yang penuh trial-error sebelum tiba bentuknya seperti sekarang。 Dunia yang kita pikir sangatlah direncanakan ternyata hanyalah proses-proses acak yang kemudian terseleksi dan bertahan。 Dunia berjalan lewat sistem bottom-up, dari komponen terkecil menuju lebih besar, bukan top-down, dikte dari atas。 Sebagaimana diungkapkan oleh Matt Ridley, "The way in which these streams of human culture flow is gradual, incremental, undirected, emergent and driven by natural selection among competing ideas。"Empat dari lima。 Atau, empat koma sembilan lebih persisnya。 。。。more

કૌસ્તુભ

लेखक उत्क्रांतिकारक क्रांतिकारी आहे, असे त्याला वाटते。 असो!ह्या पुस्तकात लेखकाने खालील १६ विषयांचे उत्क्रांतिकारक इतिहास सांगितले आहे:१。 ब्रह्माण्ड२。 नीती धर्म३。 जीवन४。 अनुवंश५。 संस्कृती६。 अर्थव्यवस्था७。 तंत्रज्ञान८。 मन९。 व्यक्तिमत्व१०。 विद्याग्रह११。 जनसंख्या१२。 नेतृत्व१३。 शासन१४。 पंथ१५。 संख्या/धनराशी१६。 अंतर जाळप्रत्येक विषयाचा उत्क्रांतिकारक इतिहास लेखकाने मांडला आहे。 पण ह्या इतिहासात लेखकाने स्वतःचे सिद्धांतांचा प्रचार सुद्धा केला आहे。 बरेचदा ह्या सिद्धांतां च्या प्रचारात उत्क्रांतीच्या प्रति लेखक उत्क्रांतिकारक क्रांतिकारी आहे, असे त्याला वाटते。 असो!ह्या पुस्तकात लेखकाने खालील १६ विषयांचे उत्क्रांतिकारक इतिहास सांगितले आहे:१。 ब्रह्माण्ड२。 नीती धर्म३。 जीवन४。 अनुवंश५。 संस्कृती६。 अर्थव्यवस्था७。 तंत्रज्ञान८。 मन९。 व्यक्तिमत्व१०。 विद्याग्रह११。 जनसंख्या१२。 नेतृत्व१३。 शासन१४。 पंथ१५。 संख्या/धनराशी१६。 अंतर जाळप्रत्येक विषयाचा उत्क्रांतिकारक इतिहास लेखकाने मांडला आहे。 पण ह्या इतिहासात लेखकाने स्वतःचे सिद्धांतांचा प्रचार सुद्धा केला आहे。 बरेचदा ह्या सिद्धांतां च्या प्रचारात उत्क्रांतीच्या प्रतिरूपे हरवल्या आहेत。 भरपूर वेळा तर असे ही वाटते की हे पुस्तक लेखकाचे सिद्धांतांचे प्रचार पुस्तिका आहे जिला उत्क्रांतीच्या इतिहास म्हणून प्रस्तुत केले आहेत。असो。 त्यातल्या त्यात आणीबाणीत संजय गांधी व त्याच्या टोळीने जे सार्वजनिक नसबंदी चे प्रकोप मांडले होते त्याचे बौद्धिक बियाणे कुठून आले हे तरी कळते。 भारत आणि इतर राष्ट्र जे औरोपीय साम्राज्यां खाली परतंत्र होते ते कितपत द्वितीय विश्व युद्धा नंतर स्वतंत्र झाले हे सुध्दा स्पष्ट होऊन जाते。हे पुस्तक वाचणे हे आवश्यक आहे, नुसती काळजी घेतली पाहिजे की ह्या पुस्तकातल्या विचारांचे जसेच तसे आग्रह नाही करायचे。 ह्या पुस्तकात प्रस्तुत केलेल्या विचारांना तार्किक युक्तीने गाळून च समजले पाहिजे。 。。。more

Hugh

Very interesting book, however, it felt that in his effort to write a book about 'everything', the author might have taken the scope of the book a bit too far。 Certain sections were strong, others lacked depth and expertise。The main premise is compelling: evolution (or bottom-up development) is the source of a lot more change in the world than it's generally given credit for (instead of design, and top-down developments)。The chapters that I found most convincing cover morality, life and genes (t Very interesting book, however, it felt that in his effort to write a book about 'everything', the author might have taken the scope of the book a bit too far。 Certain sections were strong, others lacked depth and expertise。The main premise is compelling: evolution (or bottom-up development) is the source of a lot more change in the world than it's generally given credit for (instead of design, and top-down developments)。The chapters that I found most convincing cover morality, life and genes (topics close to Matt Ridley's expertise) and money (very fascinating to hear about the creation of private currencies in Britain when there was a lack of coins to pay workers, resulting from the unwillingness of the Royal Mint to mint any extra)。The chapters where I felt the author overstretched his argument (by generalizing, cherry picking data and oversimplification) were the ones related to Education, Government and Leadership。 。。。more

Eduardo Montiel

An informative read that invites reflection and questioning of the top-down command and control institutions that shape our modern world。 I found the top-down bias fascinating: the endless fascination humans have for design rather than evolution, for direction rather than chaotic emergence。 The book is about how bottom up order, with Darwinian evolution as its primary mechanism, has driven our most important achievements and progress as a species。 Ridley draws on plenty of interesting anecdotes An informative read that invites reflection and questioning of the top-down command and control institutions that shape our modern world。 I found the top-down bias fascinating: the endless fascination humans have for design rather than evolution, for direction rather than chaotic emergence。 The book is about how bottom up order, with Darwinian evolution as its primary mechanism, has driven our most important achievements and progress as a species。 Ridley draws on plenty of interesting anecdotes and examples from science, economics, religion, history, politics and philosophy。 Patterns emerge, trends evolve。 Learning can happen without teaching。 Although we neglect and ignore them, bottom up trends shape the world and has driven our technological progress。 Although Ridley comes off a bit aggressive and opinionated in some of his arguments (the bottom up argument applies better in some contexts than others), the book is impressively well researched and documented。 Even though you may not agree with some points, there are several interesting anecdotes and fun facts to hold your attention。 I recommend this book for the more secularly and scientifically inclined。 It is particularly harsh on organized religion (an undoubtedly top down institution)。 However, I do appreciate how Ridley is an optimist at heart who constantly reminds us of the power of human progress to raise our standard of living and to cooperate as a species。 His main knock on top down thinking is that invites discrimination, perverse incentives and rent seeking amongst those in power。 Highlights: great man view of history fallacy: history is shaped by collaboration and ideas, not individuals (Diderot’s encyclopedia had no entries on individuals); Malthusian influence on population control and government policy (this is an underestimated topic in history; it’s influence on eugenics and 20th century politics) 4/5。 December 2020 。。。more

Aaron Ambrose

Sharp and challenging, to the point that I felt literally upset at times - a real rarity。 I’m already raucously on board with understanding evolutionary principles at work everywhere in the world, recognized or not。 Usually recognized in hindsight。 Here, Ridley gives the equivalent of 20 books, each chapter tersely and cleverly highlighting specific lines of evolution - of education, religion, money, etc。 It’s electrifying, but the closer he gets to the mechanics of government the slipperier his Sharp and challenging, to the point that I felt literally upset at times - a real rarity。 I’m already raucously on board with understanding evolutionary principles at work everywhere in the world, recognized or not。 Usually recognized in hindsight。 Here, Ridley gives the equivalent of 20 books, each chapter tersely and cleverly highlighting specific lines of evolution - of education, religion, money, etc。 It’s electrifying, but the closer he gets to the mechanics of government the slipperier his thinking gets。 The final chapter goes full internet-nutball, conflating peer-to-peer “messiness” with libertarian unshackling。 Whereas I’m seeing more evidence for a new intellectual and operational serfdom。 No one’s the boss of you - fantastic。 Now who’s going to run the hospital? If you have money, who cares? If you don’t have money, YOLO (imho) LOLLZ。 。。。more

Ивелина Киркова

Определено не беше моята книга, но е доста обстойна и пълна и факти。 Не ми беше много интересна, но все пак оценям труда на автора и изчерпателността и давам 4 звезди

Charles

Love Rational Optimist by Ridley, but found Evolution of Everything somewhat lacking in comparison。 This book felt too broad and too rushed; lacking sufficient evidence at times to support the underlying conclusions。

Davor Horvatic

I'm a Matt Ridley's fan for over 20 years。 Starting with Red Queen, his writings always gave me a broader and richer worldview。 The Evolution of Everything is another excellent example of a book that will inspire me, and for sure, I'll reread certain chapters again and again。 I'm a Matt Ridley's fan for over 20 years。 Starting with Red Queen, his writings always gave me a broader and richer worldview。 The Evolution of Everything is another excellent example of a book that will inspire me, and for sure, I'll reread certain chapters again and again。 。。。more

Landon

This book has some great ideas and I’m glad I read it even though it was a chore。The author’s thesis is that just like evolutionary biology results in species fitting their environment—healthcare, government, and businesses should be organized just well enough to be flexible enough to evolve and fit their patient/citizen/customer/etc needs。 I’m sure the author would murder me if he read this summary。My main complaint (you knew this was coming) is that the author glosses over too many topics in t This book has some great ideas and I’m glad I read it even though it was a chore。The author’s thesis is that just like evolutionary biology results in species fitting their environment—healthcare, government, and businesses should be organized just well enough to be flexible enough to evolve and fit their patient/citizen/customer/etc needs。 I’m sure the author would murder me if he read this summary。My main complaint (you knew this was coming) is that the author glosses over too many topics in the pages allotted to “prove” his thesis is universal。 I also feel like he tried too hard to fit every topic into his idea。 。。。more

Neha Agrawal

The fundamental premise of this book is that evolution is the best way to understand not just the natural world, but also the human world。 Everything that humans have accomplished (questionable choice of word) - be it morality, economy, technology, education, internet - is the result of human action but not of human design。Some thought provoking questions:- Why is it that conventional wisdom maintains that commerce is the cause of nastiness, not niceness?- Why do technologies, clothing, language The fundamental premise of this book is that evolution is the best way to understand not just the natural world, but also the human world。 Everything that humans have accomplished (questionable choice of word) - be it morality, economy, technology, education, internet - is the result of human action but not of human design。Some thought provoking questions:- Why is it that conventional wisdom maintains that commerce is the cause of nastiness, not niceness?- Why do technologies, clothing, language, music and economic activity change so fast, while political institutions change so slowly?- If life needs no intelligent designer, then why should the market need a central planner?- If Thomas Edison, Steve Jobs, Brahmagupta had not been born, would the light bulb, MacBook Air and zero not exist?- Can you think of examples of inventions that came long after their time, that should have been invented much sooner than they were - things we take for granted now and that would have been great for our grandparents to have had?- Is the classroom really the best way for young people to learn things?- Does education drive prosperity or vice versa?What are your thoughts on some of the above? 。。。more

Ietrio

I like the idea around which this book is built。 But, boy, Ridley has such a weak mind。 Simply because he can't grasp a concept automagically makes every part of the history fuzzy。 The second star is for the good direction。 I like the idea around which this book is built。 But, boy, Ridley has such a weak mind。 Simply because he can't grasp a concept automagically makes every part of the history fuzzy。 The second star is for the good direction。 。。。more

Rachel Grey

This book is good, and cheerful -- it's got a definite "no gods, no masters" vibe going on -- but is longer than it needs to be。 Readers should feel free to skip some of the final chapters, which don't depend on each other after the initial premise of the book has been made, if individual areas happen not to be of interest。 They don't depend on each other。 This book is good, and cheerful -- it's got a definite "no gods, no masters" vibe going on -- but is longer than it needs to be。 Readers should feel free to skip some of the final chapters, which don't depend on each other after the initial premise of the book has been made, if individual areas happen not to be of interest。 They don't depend on each other。 。。。more